Monday, May 19, 2008

I NEED one of these.

OK.

I want one of those.

A lot.

Sadly, they cost many of your earth pounds and so I'm going to have to save and buy one later. So, in the absence of sponsorship from Canon (Mr Canon, if you're reading I am still open to offers), I decided to try something a bit different. Andrew suggested a reversal ring, and after convincing me it wasn't some sort of weird proposition and it wouldn't hurt I looked them up.

Essentially you use a little adapter ring to mount your lens on your camera backwards. The reversal ring comes with the appropriate lens mount for your camera plus a thread of your choice. I'm not sure I understand the physics of it, but essentially it allows near 1:1 (macro scale) image capture depending on the lens you use.

You can pick one up on Ebay for about a tenner.

Well, since it was cheap and a bit of a giggle I picked one up and had a play. The version I bought had a 52mm thread on  it to fit my 50mm F/1.8 lens. Honestly, the only reason I picked this one was because it was to hand when I did the ordering. The ring (with appropriate thread size) will work fine on the kit lens as well I reckon.

Here's some results.

 

None of these shots have been tweaked in any particular way in order to show you straight out of the camera what I achieved in about 5 minutes. There has been no cropping at all!

For the cost of a pizza (I'm a big lad, I like my pizzas man-size), it's a nice toy and there are only two real downsides that I've seen with it.

1. You have to live in manual world. you lose the connection to your lens when its reversed so the aperture just defaults to whatever the lens rests at and can't be adjusted that I could see. You'll need to set shutter speed manually, though at least the exposure meter on my 400D kept working which helped a lot.

2. You have to focus manually. Now this doesn't sound that bad, but look at those shots above again. Depth of field is razor thin, and I mean razor. You're probably playing with millimetres in focus and given the lens is mounted backwards it can be tough to do any adjustment. I found it was simplest to just move camera (and head) backwards and forwards.

 

OK, lets be honest. this is never going to replace a dedicated macro lens (and Mr Canon, if you are reading I'd love a loan of the 100mm one mentioned above). But, if you want something different to try it's not a bad way to spend ten quid and an afternoon. I've put it in my kit bag. You just never know...

Macro | reviews | toys
Post Date: Monday, May 19, 2008 8:36:15 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Disclaimer | Comments [2] |    # Related posts:
Two Birds and the 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS Telephoto Zoom Lens
Moss
Long Time Coming Round
Hot Wheels
Backgrounds
Splash!

Tuesday, May 20, 2008 1:08:34 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
This is where you need to have two cameras, so that you an use one to take a picture of the reverse ring and the lens the wrong way around, it sounds bizarre and slighty unnatural...

Other alternatives to this ungodly treatment of your lens are a different macro lens or a close-up filter. For instance a 60mm Macro Lens is much cheaper than a 100mm lens and since we're living in a digital world, using the multiplicative factor a 60mm lens on a Digital SLR is actually a 90mm macro lens (60 * 1.5).

And while not as amazingly wonderful as a macro lens, a somewhat cheaper option is the closeup filter which is a magnifying lens and works pretty well, and what's more you don't have to turn your camera inside out and it works on autofocus - need I say anymore?
Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:53:21 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
thats some serious magnification.
Comments are closed.