Thursday, September 20, 2007
I took this a while back when I was at my parents in law. The shot itself is (like most of the shots I take) nothing special and wasn't even going to get posted until I started playing with Gimp again.

Here's the original (or at least the post Picasa size reduced original)

Mutt

(1/500, f/5, aperture priority, focal length - 39mm, 01/09/07 14:00, ISO - 100)

Just a picture of Sam, the wifes family dog. Nothing overly great about the picture, though I like the depth of field for the bushes in the background.

I loaded it into Gimp and was messing about with the clone tool to see if I could remove the pole (a washing line if you must know) and was quite impressed with the result. Then (because they mentioned it in a magazine) I found the burn tool and did some work on the rocks to make them a little darker.

I like the result. I'm not sure I like it more than the original (minus the pole* obviously) . What do you think?

Gimped Mutt

Yes, I've noticed it too. The land seems to be sloping from left to right. Honestly I can't remember if the ground did this but I have a feeling its me still not holding the camera straight and level.

* For the record I have nothing against poles. I know some nice poles. I also like pillars, stacks and columns. In fact, you could say I'm a fan of all vertical based structural implements.
Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:12:29 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)

OK, yesterday I lost my title bar pic. Today I lose the pictures for this post....

Something is out to get me.
Sunday, September 23, 2007 11:51:43 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)

You're hallucinating. I can see the pictures just fine.

I think the pole-removal was a good thing[1]. I've used Paintshop Pro's cloning on many occasions to clean up photos. For example this shot of the smaller Boa Island statue was cleaned up to remove annoying baggage left by the professional camera crew who were there at the same time as us.

I think the dog stands out better in the GIMPed pic because of the darker wall behind him (her? it?). Also, the grass looks, well more grassy. Almost as though you'd upped the saturation on it.


[1] I, also have nothing against poles, pillars, stacks or stanchions.
Shereen
Sunday, September 23, 2007 11:55:03 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)

Actually, looking at the originals, I think it was a Japanese tourist[1] I cloned out rather than baggage.

[1] I have nothing against Japanese tourists. I just didn't want to include one in my shot of the Lusty Man.
Shereen
Monday, September 24, 2007 1:10:11 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)

Truly bizarre. Today my doggies are back.


Like the picture of the Lusty Man.

I also like Japanese Tourists, though I too question their general photogenic nature when compared to natural wonders, man made wonders, interesting sights and things of general photographic quality.

That said, if a Japanese tourist (or any other tourist) would like me to take a photo of them, I'd be happy to oblige.
Monday, September 24, 2007 10:08:05 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)

Re: Lusty man. Ta. My own fav pic of it is this one. The fact that the sun came out, and the fact that all the annoying tourists stayed out of the way. It's enough to make you think that a good photograph is 95 % luck.
Shereen
Comments are closed.